Differing scholarly views on the euthanasia

Next Article How much is a life worth? Is there a price for medical treatment beyond which a life should be terminated because the person or his family cannot afford to pay any longer?

Differing scholarly views on the euthanasia

How to Write a Summary of an Article? They know when they are going to die and often suffer until then. It would allow such patients to die painlessly and peacefully instead of having to suffer.

It has been legalized nationally in countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium while also being legalized in the states of Oregon and Washington in the United States of America.

Margaret Somerville, a world renown ethicist and academic known for some of her controversial views, also gives her own insight into the topic in the article Legalized Euthanasia Only a Breath Away, published by the Globe and Mail. Somerville bases much of her argument around personal opinions and strong beliefs.

I will examine the merits and proposals brought forth by each author and compare them to each other. The contrast between these two papers is quite evident in ways of structure and delivery of information.

She establishes the two positions one has to choose from in the argument over this topic and leaves little room for change on either side.

This entire argument being based solely on her opinion and giving no facts to back either of the positions makes it very biased in favour of keeping euthanasia illegal.

Somerville believes that no one should have control over whether another human lives or dies. That is why she believes euthanasia should be an available option to terminal patients. Having an element of control over the time one dies and how it happens is something that is understandable for many terminal patients to desire.

Knowing when they are supposed to die makes it very hard for terminal patients to fully enjoy any life experiences because they constantly remind themselves of how little time they have until their death. But that is not the case in Oregon.

But within Oregon, Lehman describes how a patient must go a long process before actually being euthanized.

A panel of medical professionals considers many different factors of the patient such as diagnosis, pain tolerance, depression, state of mind, and many others. This process takes at least weeks. Strict tangencies such as the review panel that are in place within Oregon will prevent any change to euthanasia laws.

Research into the selection process directly contradicts many popular objection made by critics against legalization of euthanasia. Opinions are very powerful tools that can greatly influence the outcome and views of others in open and controversial topics.

Opinions should be based around factual information and solid research, not personal beliefs and motives. Both being very qualified and knowledgeable in different areas of study, Lehman simply uses her research and time resources fully and reaps the rewards of having a very strong opinion based around factual information based on the foundations of research.

Differing scholarly views on the euthanasia

When it comes to controversial topics such as euthanasia, it is important to collect as much information as possible before making an informed decision on whether to have it as an option to terminal patients or not.

Name of Publisher, Day Mon. Date you accessed it. Retrieved October 14, Lehmann, L.

Cultural Perspective on Euthanasia

Retrieved October 14, Word Count:EUTHANASIA AND THE RIGHT TO DIE or group of people. Each, with increasing degrees of particularity as these value judgments progress from morality to ethics to law, defines the idea of -the quality of life; and each, with increasing force, influ-ences and regulates that quality.

There are, however, two differences between this euthanasia and that of humans, which complicates the animal euthanasia issue. First, unlike humans, animals cannot express a desire to die, making “voluntary euthanasia” not meaningful for animals. When describing the people who stand on either side of this argument of legalizing euthanasia, she says, “ it comes down to a direct conflict between the value of respect for human life, on the one hand, and individual rights to autonomy and self-determination – the value of `choice`- on the other.

Such a re-assessment essentially also needs to address ethnic diversity, because different belief systems and norms of behaviour will affect people’s views of euthanasia.

Respondents from the three major ethnic groupings in South Africa were drawn and were asked to complete a basic demographic questionnaire and the Euthanasia Attitude Scale. Euthanasia advocates argue that not allowing euthanasia is to deny humans the right to die. Opponents to euthanasia argue that it is not a human right.

Following is a list of the different reason why pro and anti-euthanasia advocates espouse their respective views. Basic Arguments in favour of Euthanasia Rights: Human beings have the right to decide when and how to die. Mercy: It is cruel and inhumane to refuse someone the right to die, when they are suffering intolerable and unstoppable pain, or distress.

Differing scholarly views on the euthanasia
Beliefs and Arguments about Euthanasia | The Life Resources Charitable Trust