Scores range from 1 low to 5 high. Is the whole paper on the focus?
Novice Integration of Knowledge The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position. The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment. The topic is not clearly defined. The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively.
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.
Cohesiveness Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings.
Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Sometimes ties together information from all sources.
Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues.
Headings are necessary to link concepts. Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited.
All web sites utilized are authoritative. All web sites utilized are credible. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books.Example 1 - Research Paper Rubric.
Cole Library Menu Additional Navigation. Syllabi; Focusing on Assignments. Ideas for Strengthening Research Skills; that qualities of the paper will “add up” to a specified score or grade or that all dimensions are of equal grading value.
Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent.
Criteria Exemplary Good Acceptable Unacceptable 2 Tone The tone is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic research paper. The tone is generally professional. Research paper on world war 1 tonna galea descriptive essay goede opbouw essay help my favourite player sachin tendulkar essay in english cultural capital in education essay quotes healthy eating essay conclusion words greek approach to science and philosophy essay canada is the best country to live in essay cite a visit to a park short essay about myself 10 page essay on pollution.
Sample Rubric for Grading a Research Paper [Download Microsoft Word Document] Outstanding Good Fair Acceptable; Visual Presentation: Cover page with relevant info, including descriptive title. Section headings. Good graphics, with appropriate citations.
Clean and professional looking. Cover page. Submit your paper and have it immediately analyzed by dozens of modules that check for plagiarism, grammar errors, spelling mistakes, and much more. Let our proofreading tool improve your writing.