Outlawed at the beginning of the 20th Century, private corporations are once again owning and operating prisons for profit.
After years of corruption and mismanagement, the small, blue-collar city south of Los Angeles fired almost all of its employees, dismantled its police department and contracted with a neighboring city to take over most municipal tasks.
As the city drowned in deficits and faced multiple lawsuits, city leaders saw outsourcing as a light at the end of a collapsing tunnel.
But it was only a mirage. By September, Bell had scrapped its contract with Maywood, leaving the city to fend for itself and find new contractors for its outsourcing hopes.
The search for financial salvation is sweeping the country as local governments grapple with waning sales and property tax revenues. The economic recession has strangled budgets, forcing layoffs and the disbanding of departments.
Feeling pushed to the brink of bankruptcy, cities are trying to find effective ways to make do with less. Maywood, in its outsourcing attempt, may be the most extreme example, but in California and other states in the past decade, more public officials have turned to outside sources for help in providing services at a lower cost to the state.
In theory, the idea of contracting public services to private companies to cut costs makes sense. But according to analysts, outsourcing is by no means a perfect Privatization of corrections.
The privatization of public services can erode accountability and transparency, and drive governments deeper into debt. The trend stems from the common belief that private companies can help governments save or make money by doing jobs faster and cheaper, or managing a public asset more efficiently.
This past March, for example, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie created the state Privatization Task Force to review privatization opportunities within state government and identify barriers.
As former mayor of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Gov. Chicago has privatized more than 40 city services. InWest Virginia Gov. The states most successful in privatization created a permanent, centralized entity to manage and oversee the operation, from project analysis and vendor selection to contracting and procurement.
For governments that forgo due diligence, choose ill-equipped contractors and fail to monitor progress, however, outsourcing deals can turn into costly disasters.
The Effects of Inefficient Outsourcing No industry has gone through greater outsourcing catastrophes in the past year than government IT.
Technology plays such a critical role in the storage and delivery of vital data that even minor delays and deficiencies can disrupt business operations, such as car registration renewals, and unemployment and medical care services.
Red tape usually prevents governments from making significant modifications, and private companies lack the authority to enforce real changes.
When such a public-private stalemate stunts a project, it helps to have an exit strategy. Those risks extend beyond the technology world. Inin the wake of an audit of economic development agreements between Niagara Falls and two developers, New York state Comptroller Thomas P.
DiNapoli discovered that the projects faltered because the city failed to monitor development contracts. One of the projects, a downtown retail mall, has been vacant since ; the second project, which began inyielded nothing more than a rudimentary building foundation. Strichman says governments should hire an outsourcing consultant who can provide an independent assessment.
But even with a consultant, conflicts of interest can tarnish a golden opportunity. After all, private companies may want to provide a service efficiently and well -- and often do -- but governments must ride herd on implementation of the contract. If they can cut corners in any way, they often do.
|Jailing Americans for Profit: The Rise of the Prison Industrial Complex | HuffPost||Outlawed at the beginning of the 20th Century, private corporations are once again owning and operating prisons for profit.|
|The Race to Buy Up the World's Water||Tweet on Twitter For several decades, prison populations have been on the rise in the United States and around the world. There are several countries that greatly exceed the amount of space that has been allotted for prisoners.|
The law outlines analysis procedures and reporting requirements. The laws were created to promote transparency and to ensure that agencies complete an effective cost-benefit analysis prior to procurements. But the city ceased its cost analysis after realizing that no such private services existed in the area.
Competition drives prices down.11/26/ Officer, That Dog Doesn’t Have Water - Arrest That Man; 11/26/ The Color of Justice: Racial and Ethnic Disparity in State Prisons. CCA is America's leader in partnership corrections. We provide solutions that combine public sector oversight with private sector efficiency.
In , our company became the first to provide privatized prison, jail, and detention services. 5 Foremost Pros and Cons of Private Prisons. List of Pros and Cons; Oct 28, Corrections Corporation of America, the largest for-profit private prison company in the US, issued a letter to 48 state governors in In that letter, the CCA offered to purchase and operate public state prisons, but required a year contract that.
part iii: forensic services for persons who are intellectually disabled or autistic (ss.
). Privatization of Corrections Essay. Privatization of Corrections Criminal Justice Professor Fox Larisa Terwilliger One of the nation’s largest challenges in present times concerns the criminal justice system - Privatization of Corrections Essay introduction.
Overcrowding in today’s prisons has become a daunting problem with no apparent easy solution (Greene, ). Watch video · (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post) Disturbances in the facilities, the report said, led in recent years to “extensive property damage, bodily injury, and the death of a Correctional.